|
Design Features - Look
A visual inspection follows, in part to see if what the manufacturer printed on the packet matches the tights inside. It is quite surprising how often this is not the case, particularly when the design of the tights changes from season to season.
The first thing we look at is whether the tights are sheer to waist, and if not what sort of style the reinforced brief is.
Next we look at the seams in the brief. We look at the quality of the stitching and particularly whether a flat seaming technique has been used. A flat seam will show less through close fitting clothes and being more expensive to sew is a good general indication of quality.
The seaming process will often involve a gusset. A gusset will generally lead to a better fit. Gussets can be either made of the same material as the brief, or a slightly heavier nylon (seldom lighter), and may be lined with cotton or silk for reasons of hygiene.
There may or may not be a reinforced strip either side of the seam in the panty, and in some cases this reinforcement will also carry on below the waistband. Reinforcement like this can detract from the look of sheer to waist tights, but greatly improves durability. The reinforced band below the waistband, known as a finger band, is particularly important in avoiding ripping tights pulling them up.
Off course not all tights have a vertical seam in the brief. Seamless tights are more expensive, but Mel discovered what many of us already knew when she tested this pair. Seamless can be the most comfortable rights.
A particularly attractive waistband may also warrant a comment.
We look at the legs then, particularly to see if they have been shaped, either by shaping the straight legs using heat and a former or by having a fully knitted in heel.
Finally we look at the toes, to see if they are sheer, invisibly reinforced or fully reinforced, and to judge the quality of the toe seam.
|